Thursday, April 23, 2026

Poetry Friday: “Impressions” — An Ekphrastic

Last month, Tanita Davis shared the latest challenge from the Poetry Pals


Here’s the scoop: we’re writing ekphrastic poems, which might pair beautifully with your plans for National Poetry Month (I’m attempting poetry comics). Ekphrasis is a Greek word which means “description,” and you’re invited to choose your own image from anywhere – personal pictures or otherwise. Are you in? Good! You’ll have the month to craft your creation and share it April 24th in a blog post and/or on social media with the tag #PoetryPals. We hope you’ll play along!



Oooh, I love an ekphrastic. Even so, I put this assignment off until this week because … well, because that’s how I roll. Image choice was WIDE open, so I had trouble narrowing it down. Then yesterday, out of the blue, this one — A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte by Georges Seurat — came to mind. 


I realized I’ve never thought much about the people depicted in this painting. I’ve assumed they're an ordinary assortment of urbanites enjoying a day by the water. It turns out there's other speculation about them too. I found several commentaries that remarked on this idea: 

There has been scholarly debate as to why Seurat included certain motifs in the painting, possibly alluding to prostitution that took place on the island, where clients would meet. Two notable motifs include the woman to the left with the fishing rod and the woman to the right with the monkey.

The fishing rod could be suggestive of the idea of “fishing” for a possible desirable woman or that the prostitutes fished for prospective clients. The female monkey’s name in French was singesse, which was also a term utilized for prostitutes. The woman on the right could be with a client.

                                                     — from Art in Context

Who knew? 

On the other hand, given that women are routinely misjudged, unfairly labeled, frequently stereotyped, presumed upon, lied about, and otherwise wronged and maligned, the idea/poem/twist that came to me was this:   



Impressions  
(after A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grand Jatte


People always have their opinions. 

Some of you eye us and think,
“Ah, another Sunday in the park 
with George.” 
But also? 
Many look askance. 
They assign a seedy motive
to my sister’s fishing expedition. 
Presume my pet monkey 
means I am a woman 
of questionable character. 
But perhaps I just love animals? 

Why has no one asserted 
or assumed that 
my predominant thoughts are these: 
"This fabric does not breathe
I’m ready to go. 
I hate this stupid bustle. 
It's hitting the floor the minute 
my monkey and I get home.” 

    — Karen Edmisten 

~~~~~~~~~~

The Queen of Ekphrastics — visit her entire “ArtSpeak” series here —

27 comments:

Tricia Stohr-Hunt said...

I adore your poem. I'm ready to throw off whatever I'm wearing when I get home. I can only image what that dress was like. Well done!

Rose Cappelli said...

Thanks for the smile this morning! I agree that bustle is a bit much.

Irene Latham said...

Stupid bustle! Well done, Karen! Reminds me of the verse novel I just finished, LOVE, SIVVY, about high school/college age Sylvia Plath fighting those gender stereotypes, claiming her identity in her poems. xo

Karen Edmisten said...

Thanks, Tricia! I remember once when my youngest was three years old and we'd just gotten home from a Christmas Eve service. We walked in the door and — coat still on, hood still tied around her little cheeks — she plopped down on the floor and ripped off her shoes and tights, lol. I thought, "That's my girl!" :D

Karen Edmisten said...

Rose, yes, wouldn't it have been awful to wear those??

Karen Edmisten said...

Irene, that sounds so intriguing. I'll put that on my library list right now!

Janice Scully said...

I love the voice in the poem, as if the writer has had enough of stupid assumptions. A great pairing here of voice and art. What a fun post!

elli said...

Love this poem of yours, Karen!thnk you, as ever, for sharing 🩵

Carol Varsalona said...

Karen, the artwork you shared is one of my favorites. The back matter was a shock since there were children in the painting. I never thought anything different than a walk in the park. You certainly did some research and brought a different perspective to your poem. Your predominant thougths may have been exactly what the women of that time period thought.

jama said...

Had no idea about the controversial motifs in this painting. Fascinating! Of course I like your realistic take on what those women were really thinking at the time. Was Michael Jackson maligned because he had a monkey? :D

tanita✿davis said...

I'm DYING. That is HILARIOUS. And she's right - the MINUTE she gets home, that bustle's gotta go. The bustle was the bra of the 18th-19th century...

I have always LOVE, love, loved this painting - I had it in a book when I was a child, thus I did not ever read that terribly grown up and jaded discussion of motif. I think that the banality of the women knitting and fishing and all of that makes the idea of this as a setting for sex work even more ...surprising. I still love it.

Karen Edmisten said...

Ha, yes, Janice, she has had enough! :D And thanks!

Karen Edmisten said...

Thank you so much, elli!

Karen Edmisten said...

Carol, I had never read any commentary on this painting either, but I’ve always liked it so much. I was surprised! I don’t think Seurat himself ever said this. He said, "I want to make modern people, in their essential traits, move about as they do on those friezes, and place them on canvases organized by harmonies of color, by directions of the tones in harmony with the lines, and by the directions of the lines.” I had never thought of it as a frieze either, but I can see that in his representation.

Karen Edmisten said...

Jama, I could go down rabbit holes like this all day! :D

Karen Edmisten said...

Thanks, Tanita!
“The bustle was the bra of the 18th-19th century…” YES! (Off it goes!)
It IS a jaded take, isn’t it? I am going to continue to see this painting in light of the voice I gave the woman with the monkey. Perhaps she just loves animals! :)

Robyn Hood Black said...

HA!!!! I will never look at this painting the same way again. Couldn't love your poem about it any more! Thanks for the art lesson (between you & Jama, I'm feeling more educated about some old familiar paintings/subjects this week), and for the (hilarious) fresh take. ;0)

Karen Edmisten said...

Thanks so much, Robyn! I learned a lot from Jama’s post too. Love a deep dive into a piece of art, and especially anything about Van Gogh!

Patricia Franz said...

Yikes! I wrote a poem to that painting in 2022 and when I fished it out I realized I didn't even use the correct name of the painting!

Gazing, inspired by “A Sunday on La Grande Jatte”

tiny dots by Georges Seurat
A Sunday on La Grande Jatte
memory of another day
sun, a stroll, dogs at play
wishing it were you

ladies fish
the aging wish
someone knits
a child skips
quiet couples reminisce
wishing it were you


July 4, 2022
©draft, Patricia J. Franz

Karen Edmisten said...

Oh, I love this, Patricia! It captures the feelings I've always had about the painting more accurately than the other theories do. :)

Mary Lee said...

I love your take on this picture! I, too, had fun with it during NPM 2013: http://www.maryleehahn.com/2013/04/common-inspiration-uncommon-creations11.html

Jill Dailey said...

Hi Karen, love your creative Ekphrastic, especially how you gave "voice" to the "bustled" lady. Yes, to getting rid of it all and no judgements about the monkey lol. Love how your poem plays with "impressions" in an Impressionistic painting:) Great fun!

April Halprin Wayland said...

Karen ~ thank you for this fresh take on this beautiful painting (which always brings to mind SUNDAY IN THE PARK WITH GEORGE—where my crush on Mandy Patinkin began). And now I'll add the feisty thoughts of the women in the park (which I’ll *never* forget) when I see it next! According to google, “the suffragette movement in France began taking shape in the late 19th century”. So, it was no doubt building steam by the time Seurat was painting it 1884-1886. Bravo on your poem!

Karen Edmisten said...

Mary Lee, so fun to go back and see your take on it! You turned it on its head in such an original way. Thanks for sharing that!

Jill, I’m glad you caught the wordplay there! :D I know Seurat moved into Neo-impressionism, and I moved into a different take on the scene. ;)

Karen Edmisten said...

April, I STILL have a crush on Mandy Patinkin, lol! He’s a national treasure.

Denise Krebs said...

Karen, what a fun post! I had never noticed the monkey or fishing pole. I do love your interpretation of the gathering much better. Especially the end with the removal of the bustle and the fabric that doesn't breathe. Bravo!

Karen Edmisten said...

Thanks so much, Denise! I’m not sure I’d ever noticed those things before either, lol.